Archive for the ‘Internet’ tag
When a double-click misfires
Imitation is one of the highest forms of flattery. Lift your style or prowess by leveraging someone’s tricks of the trade and usually that’s ok, provided you openly lay the cards on the table. All hard work deserves credit and, you’ve got to pay your dues. Most don’t react well to their ideas re-packaged, especially when the guilty party extols the highest virtues:
The VCE exam body has been accused of plagiarism and breach of copyright in a contentious English paper sat by more than 40,000 students. The English exam featured a column on tattoos by Melbourne writer Helen Razer without her permission and without acknowledging she was the author – The Age
On face value, it would seem that some overly hasty clicking has landed the VCE exam body in a spot of bother. Try as I might, I can’t help but draw comparisons to an ill-prepared student on the eve of an assignment due date: A quick Google and a few swift clicks and edits later, and you’ve got yourself something worthy of submission. You might even get away with it too, if your teacher has never used a computer or thinks the Internet is something seen on a tennis court.
As a body crafting a paper to test skills in English, it might not have been the smartest move.
In the spirit of a fair fight, and to immediately jump on the moral high-horse, let’s assume an innocent clerical error is at fault here. After all, it’s not as if basic referencing skills (let alone those for new media) have existed for that long.
But, If you’re putting together a paper that’s so devoid of content (and the masses of printed material doesn’t fit your appetite for choice) that you find yourself trawling the blogosphere for an article with some teeth, don’t sell the idea short. Leverage the worlds’ largest network computers as you will, but don’t stop at snipping and re-working just a single blog post.
Push the envelope to keep an exam on Australian-English relevant and engaging for the students sitting it. How about a passage written entirely in net-lingo (OMG, srsly!?)? Or, a Twitter-esque component, challenging students to answer a study question in 140-characters or less (with bonus points for a celebrity mention or inventive smiley emoticon).
If the sole intent here is to ensure the paper is relevant and engaging for students, it’d be irresponsible to head in any other direction.
As for the gold pot of ideas? Don’t worry, you can thank me later.